朴正炫
发表于5分钟前
回复
:戴安(黛安·基顿 Diane Keaton 饰)和丈夫共同度过了40年的美好岁月,现如今,丈夫早她一步离开了这个世界,留下戴安努力适应一个人的生活。薇薇安(简·方达 Jane Fonda 饰)年过60却依然风韵犹存,可如此美丽的她并没有选择婚姻,而是自由自在的享受着她的单身生活。莎伦(坎迪斯·伯根 Candice Bergen 饰)不幸的拥有一段失败的婚姻,她和丈夫之间的离婚手续办了10年都没有一个结果。卡洛尔(玛丽·斯汀伯根 Mary Steenburgen 饰)则做梦也没有想到,自己维持了35年的婚姻,会突然破碎殆尽。这四个情感经历大相径庭的女人同属于一个读书俱乐部,这一次,她们决定共读畅销书《五十度灰》,这本性感火辣的书将会令她们每一个人的人生发生改变。
林沐桦
发表于9分钟前
回复
:A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.- JohnHowardReid, imdb